Whitelabels.com vs GammaStack 2027: Fast Launch or Owned Code
Whitelabels.com and GammaStack solve different problems. Whitelabels.com is a rented platform. It costs $99 to set up plus 20% of GGR, and a casino can be live in minutes. GammaStack is a build-and-own provider. It charges €20,000 to €60,000 to set up plus a fixed monthly fee. It takes a low or no GGR share on ready-to-launch products and offers source code ownership on custom builds. In the 2027 ranking Whitelabels.com is first at 9.4 and GammaStack is fifth at 8.4. The better pick depends on your budget, your timeline and whether you want to own the code.
- The core difference: rent a platform or own one
- Setup cost and monthly fees
- The revenue model: 20% all-in vs a fixed fee
- All-in cost at $50K, $250K and $750K GGR
- Time to launch
- Games, payments and tools
- Licensing: what each platform covers
- Scores criterion by criterion
- Full comparison table
- When GammaStack is the better fit
- Who Whitelabels.com is built for
- Verdict by use case
- FAQ
The core difference: rent a platform or own one
Whitelabels.com sells a finished product that you configure yourself. You pick a template, choose a licence provider, connect payments and launch. GammaStack sells a project. You scope the product, sign a contract, and a team builds and launches it for you. Most of the numbers below follow from that one contrast.
The two companies also differ in age. Whitelabels.com’s operator, PLANCK ONLINE LTD, was incorporated in Cyprus in March 2023. GammaStack began in 2012 in Indore, India, as Techracers. It says it has delivered 220+ projects across 45+ countries.
In our 2027 ranking of white label casino platforms, Whitelabels.com scores 9.4 and GammaStack scores 8.4. Pricing and time to launch carry 35% of the weight, and Whitelabels.com leads on both. GammaStack beats it on one criterion only. We cover that below.
Setup cost and monthly fees
Whitelabels.com charges $99 once. The price is published, it is the same for every operator, and there is no monthly platform fee. Optional gamification add-ons are billed monthly, and you do not need them to launch.
Whitelabels.com’s pricing page: the $99 setup fee and 20% revenue share sit under every optional add-on tier, via whitelabels.com.
GammaStack’s setup range is €20,000 to €60,000. That range comes from the iGaming Software Providers directory, not from GammaStack’s own site. GammaStack also charges a fixed monthly platform fee. The amount is negotiated per client and not published. Licensing help is billed separately, and so are custom game integrations outside its default aggregation.
At the low end of GammaStack’s range, the entry ticket is more than 200 times larger. The bigger bill buys a delivery team, custom front-end work and, on custom builds, the code itself.
The revenue model: 20% all-in vs a fixed fee
Whitelabels.com takes 20% of GGR, and the share is all-inclusive. Games, CRM, affiliate tracking, 250+ payment providers, support and licence access all sit inside it. There is no second bill. It is the highest GGR share in our ranking, and the platform data says so plainly. At $1,000,000 of annual GGR, 20% comes to $200,000.
GammaStack goes the other way. On white label and turnkey products it takes no revenue share. Its own FAQ says: “There are no hidden royalties. However, with ready-to-launch solutions, we follow a low/no GGR policy.” You pay a fixed monthly fee and keep the revenue a vendor would otherwise take. That is why GammaStack scores 9.5 on revenue share against 8.5 for Whitelabels.com.
Two cautions apply. “Low/no” is not “none” in every contract, so get the GGR line in writing. And no revenue share does not mean no other costs. Setup, the monthly fee, licence work and game content sit outside it.
All-in cost at $50K, $250K and $750K GGR
We model all-in annual cost at three GGR levels. The method follows our ranking table footnote. It adds the platform GGR share and a game studio cut (15% estimated where games are not included). It then adds the setup fee, the monthly minimum and a licence ($70K added where the platform does not confirm one). An asterisk means the figure includes estimates.
| Annual GGR |  Whitelabels.com |  GammaStack |
|---|---|---|
| $50K | $10K | $158K* |
| $250K | $50K | $188K* |
| $750K | $150K | $263K* |
Whitelabels.com’s figures are simply 20% of GGR, with no estimates, because its price is published and covers everything. The $99 setup fee is rounded away. GammaStack does not sublicense, so you carry a licence cost that the model has to estimate.
Whitelabels.com is cheaper at every level shown. The gap narrows from $148K at $50K GGR to $113K at $750K. GammaStack’s cost is mostly fixed, so it grows slowly as GGR rises. Whitelabels.com’s cost grows with every dollar. The two lines are still far apart at $750K, so this model does not show where they cross.
GammaStack’s own first-year range in our platform data is $55,000 to $200,000, with $110,000 as the realistic case. The conservative and realistic cases sit below the model. Ask for a written quote and compare it with the table. Our guide to all-in white label cost at $50K, $250K and $750K GGR shows the same method across all twelve platforms.
Time to launch
Whitelabels.com launches in minutes. The self-service configurator covers branding, KYC and AML tools, payments and licence-provider selection in one flow. There is no sales call and no NDA. It scores 10.0 for time to launch, the top mark in the ranking.
GammaStack’s FAQ puts a white label launch at 2 to 4 weeks and a turnkey launch at 5 weeks. Our own build-up of the stages lands at 4 to 6 weeks for white label and 5 to 8 weeks for turnkey. Contract signing alone takes 1 to 2 weeks. Integration, branding, compliance, payments and testing follow. A custom platform runs 6 to 12+ months.
Source code ownership comes with those custom solutions. If you want the code, plan on most of a year. If you want to test a market this week, only one of these two platforms can do it. The launch timeline by platform compares all twelve.
Games, payments and tools
Whitelabels.com carries 20,000+ games from studios such as Pragmatic Play, Spribe and Evolution. It adds a sportsbook with 140,000+ events and live dealer tables. Over 250 payment providers are pre-integrated, covering cards, crypto and local methods in 100+ countries. CRM and affiliate tools are built in, and so is the Lumio AI assistant.
Whitelabels.com positions itself as a full-stack platform: games, sports betting, lotto and payment providers in one package, via whitelabels.com.
GammaStack lists 8,000+ games from 80+ providers, including NetEnt, Pragmatic Play, Microgaming, Evolution and Play’n GO. Its GS CORE product is a player account system that covers sportsbook, casino, lottery and sweepstakes under one account. It covers KYC, payments and risk. Affiliate and agent tools are built in. GammaStack does not publish a payment provider count, and it supports BTC, ETH, USDT, LTC and BNB.
Games and payments both favour Whitelabels.com on the scores: 9.0 against 7.5 for games, and 9.5 against 8.2 for payments. GammaStack’s own strength is the front end. It builds custom interfaces and does not force a template. Whitelabels.com is configurator-led, so a fully custom design is not what it sells.
GammaStack’s GammaCasino page lists the stack in one place: gaming content, back office, RNG, payments, and PAM, CRM and CMS, via gammastack.com.
Licensing: what each platform covers
Whitelabels.com does not require you to hold a gaming licence. You choose a licence provider in the configurator and launch under that licence. Curaçao is the main option, with Anjouan also available. MGA, Isle of Man and UKGC licences are in process and not yet available. If you need an MGA B2B sublicence or the UK market today, Whitelabels.com cannot offer it yet.
GammaStack does not provide sublicensing. You need your own licence. It helps you get one in Curaçao, Malta, the UK (assistance only) and Anjouan. It also assists with US state-level sports betting licences. That breadth of help is real, but the licence, its cost and its timeline are yours to carry. Our roundup of platforms that offer sublicensing shows who sells a licence you can launch under.
The licensing score is 9.0 for Whitelabels.com and 7.8 for GammaStack. The gap comes mostly from the fact that Whitelabels.com gives you licence access on day one. If you launch under a provider’s licence, read what happens if that licence is suspended. We cover that in the licence revocation risk guide.
Scores criterion by criterion
The 2027 scores come from seven weighted criteria, which are explained on the About page.
| Criterion (weight) | Whitelabels.com | GammaStack |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (20%) | 10.0 | 8.8 |
| Time to launch (15%) | 10.0 | 8.5 |
| Revenue share (15%) | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Game library (15%) | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Licensing (15%) | 9.0 | 7.8 |
| Payments (10%) | 9.5 | 8.2 |
| Support (10%) | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Overall | 9.4 | 8.4 |
GammaStack wins one row and Whitelabels.com wins six. These criteria do not measure source code ownership, US sweepstakes support or custom front-end work. A team that values those things can reasonably rank GammaStack higher for its own plan.
Full comparison table
| Whitelabels.com | GammaStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Setup fee | $99 (one-time, published) | €20,000-€60,000 (third-party directory range) |
| GGR share | 20%, all-inclusive | Low or no GGR on ready-to-launch products |
| Monthly platform fee | $0 (optional add-ons) | Fixed fee, amount negotiated |
| All-in cost at $50K / $250K / $750K GGR | $10K / $50K / $150K | $158K* / $188K* / $263K* |
| Time to launch | Minutes, self-service | White label 2-4 weeks (4-6 realistic), turnkey 5 weeks, custom 6-12+ months |
| Games | 20,000+ | 8,000+ from 80+ providers |
| Payments | 250+ providers pre-integrated | Count not published, crypto rails included |
| CRM and affiliate tools | Built in | Built in via GS CORE |
| Licence | Pick a provider in the configurator: Curaçao, Anjouan (MGA, Isle of Man, UKGC in process) | No sublicensing, own licence needed, help in Curaçao, Malta, UK, Anjouan, US states |
| Source code ownership | No, SaaS model | Yes, on custom builds with IP transfer |
| Founded | 2023, Nicosia, Cyprus | 2012, offices in Wilmington, Riga, Malta, Indore |
| Best markets | LATAM, Africa, South East Asia, crypto-friendly markets | North America (US sports betting), Europe, LATAM, Asia, Middle East |
| 2027 rank and score | 1st, 9.4 | 5th, 8.4 |
When GammaStack is the better fit
GammaStack fits an operator who wants to own the technology. Source code ownership and IP transfer on custom builds are rare at this price tier. If your plan is a long-term brand on its own platform, that matters more than speed. Expect a six-figure budget and a build that takes most of a year.
It also fits an operator who already holds, or will secure, a licence. A fixed monthly fee gets more attractive as GGR grows. Whitelabels.com’s own data marks $500K+ in annual GGR as the point where a 20% share starts to hurt. Above that level, a GammaStack quote is worth putting next to 20% of your forecast.
US sports betting at state level and sweepstakes casinos are also GammaStack territory. It lists both, and its GammaSweep product launches in under 5 weeks. Whitelabels.com does not list the US among its best markets.
What GammaStack does not give you is a published fixed price, a sublicence, a fast launch or a deep game library. Its 8,000+ titles trail the 20,000+ on Whitelabels.com. The GammaStack platform review covers the full feature set.
If GammaStack does not fit, the list of GammaStack alternatives shows what else sits in its price band.
Who Whitelabels.com is built for
Whitelabels.com suits the operator who wants the real number first. The $99 fee and the 20% all-in share are published, and the configurator needs no sales call. That fits affiliates turning existing traffic into a branded casino, first-time operators with no licence, and anyone testing a market before committing real capital. Its best markets are LATAM, Africa, South East Asia and crypto-friendly jurisdictions. If you later exit, a marketplace lets you sell the brand, and you own the brand, domain and player base.
Read the trade-offs before you sign up. The 20% share is the highest in our ranking. The company is the newest on the list, and its founders are not named publicly. Its network figures, such as brands launched, are company-stated and not independently verified. It publishes no minimum contract term and no human support response times. The Whitelabels.com platform review lists the current pricing and features.
For another fast, low-cost option, see how it compares in Whitelabels.com vs NuxGame.
Verdict by use case
There is no single winner for every plan. By score, Whitelabels.com leads at 9.4 against 8.4, but the right pick depends on what you are building.
- Pick Whitelabels.com to test a market on a small budget, or if you are a first-time operator without a licence.
- Pick Whitelabels.com for LATAM, Africa or South East Asia launches that need to go live this week.
- Pick GammaStack if owning the source code is a firm requirement and you can wait 6 to 12+ months.
- Pick GammaStack for US state-level sports betting or a sweepstakes casino.
- Get a GammaStack quote if you forecast $500K+ in annual GGR and already hold your own licence.
- Pick neither if you need an MGA B2B sublicence or UKGC cover today. Neither platform sells it yet.
If NuxGame is also on your shortlist, our NuxGame vs GammaStack comparison covers that pair in the same format.
FAQ
Is GammaStack’s no revenue share model really free of GGR?
For ready-to-launch white label and turnkey products, GammaStack’s published position is a low or no GGR policy with a fixed monthly fee. The fee amount is not published and is negotiated per client. Ask for the GGR line, the monthly fee and the minimum term in writing. Our guide on how to compare white label casino proposals lists the lines to check.
Can I own the platform code with Whitelabels.com?
No. Whitelabels.com is a SaaS platform, so the code stays with the provider. You own the brand, the domain and the player base, and you can list the brand on its marketplace. Source code ownership is a GammaStack feature, and only on custom solutions. A custom build takes 6 to 12+ months, so decide early whether you need it.
Do I need my own licence on either platform?
Not on Whitelabels.com. You select a licence provider in the configurator and launch under that licence. On GammaStack you do, because it does not sublicense. It assists with applications in Curaçao, Malta, the UK and Anjouan, and with US state-level sports betting. Build that licence cost and timeline into your plan before you sign.
Which one is better for a US sweepstakes or sports betting launch?
GammaStack lists US state-level sports betting assistance and a dedicated sweepstakes casino product, GammaSweep, which it says deploys in under 5 weeks. Whitelabels.com does not list the US among its best markets. US launches also need state licensing and legal work, so speak to a lawyer in the state you target.
Can I start on Whitelabels.com and move to GammaStack later?
Yes. Starting cheaply to validate a brand and moving later is a reasonable sequence. Because you own the brand, domain and player base, the business moves with you. The move still takes planning, including player data, payments and the licence. Our migration checklist covers the steps. Start that planning before the move becomes urgent.
About the Author
Founder, best-white-label-casinos.org
iGaming operator and B2B software evaluator with 20 years of experience launching and reviewing online casino platforms across MGA, Curaçao, and crypto-native environments. Ratings are based on cost transparency, feature depth, regulatory compliance, and operator support quality.
Looking for the best white label casino platform?
Compare 12 providers by cost, launch time, licensing support and game library. Independent editorial, no paid placements.
Compare All Platforms →
← Previous
White Label vs Source Code Purchase in 2027: When Each One Makes Sense
White label or buy the source code in 2027? Compare all-in costs at $50K, $250K and $750K GGR, see what a code purchase leaves out and who should pick which.
Next →
5 Best Alternatives to Gambling Soft in 2027
5 real alternatives to Gambling Soft in 2027 for operators who want a licence route, more games or ongoing support, compared on cost, games and licensing.