best-white-label-casinos.org Launched: The Research Behind the First White Label Casino Comparison 2022
Photo: Unsplash
best-white-label-casinos.org launched in 2022 as an independent research site for white label casino solutions. The launch coincided with our first operator survey: a phone outreach programme that reached 418 active casino operators, software developers and iGaming affiliates across April 2022.
91 percent of respondents who engaged with the beta version of the site said they would recommend it to colleagues, business partners or fellow operators. For a new project, that was the signal we needed. It confirmed the hypothesis behind the launch: the iGaming niche lacked a neutral reference for white label platform research, and operators wanted one.
What exactly was measured
The 2022 survey was our founding survey. It served two purposes: to understand what iGaming professionals needed from a platform comparison site, and to test whether the early versions of our reviews were actually useful. Respondents were surveyed by phone. Questions focused on the early website and on general operator research habits:
- How useful was the early version of best-white-label-casinos.org for platform research?
- How trustworthy were the initial reviews and comparisons rated?
- Would respondents recommend the website to other operators?
- What was missing that we needed to add?
| Criterion | Rating |
|---|---|
| Usefulness in platform comparison | 4.4 / 5 |
| Trustworthiness of content | 4.3 / 5 |
| Recommendation rate | 91% |
| Number of respondents | 418 |
| Survey period | April 2022 |
For a launch year, these were encouraging numbers. The feedback also gave us a clear roadmap: expand platform coverage, deepen licensing analysis, and add country-specific guides for emerging markets.
Why we started the site
Many websites recommended casino platforms without having seriously evaluated them. Content was generated in bulk, rankings were sponsored, and there was no traceable basis for the recommendations. The iGaming niche was particularly affected by this pattern. Operators evaluating platforms relied on trade show conversations, LinkedIn references, and the sales team they happened to meet first.
We saw a gap.
The founding idea was simple: produce platform reviews with publicly documented methodology, verifiable data sources, and honest red flag reporting. Not the biggest list. Not the flashiest content. Just the reference we wished existed when we started researching the niche ourselves.
The initial 2022 scoring framework covered 7 platforms (the original launch list) on six criteria:
| Factor | 2022 Weighting |
|---|---|
| Pricing and Setup Cost | 25% |
| Game Library Depth | 20% |
| Time to Launch | 20% |
| Licensing Support | 15% |
| Revenue Share Model | 10% |
| Support Quality | 10% |
The original 2022 list was more focused than later years. We prioritised depth over breadth and only covered platforms we had directly researched against public data. The full 10-platform comparison that exists in 2026 grew iteratively over four years of editorial work.
No platform provider could buy its way into our ranking. The order came from the data. That rule was set on day one and has not changed since.
SOFTSWISS led our initial 2022 ranking. At that time, approximately 800 launched brands, a fast-growing Bitcoin casino infrastructure, and MGA B2B sublicensing made it the clearest benchmark platform. The SOFTSWISS review was one of the three platforms we covered at launch.
What operators actually said in 2022
An excerpt from the founding survey feedback:
βI have been looking for something like this for two years. The iGaming niche has plenty of trade press but no neutral comparison. Glad someone finally built it.β
βThe methodology page was the first thing I read. That told me this was a serious project. Most casino comparison sites cannot explain how they score anything.β
βThe SOFTSWISS and SoftGamings side-by-side was better than any trade press coverage I had seen. Actually explained the trade-offs.β
βAs an affiliate, I need resources I can cite when operators ask why I recommend one platform over another. Most platform websites are marketing pages, not references.β
βThe honest treatment of pricing was refreshing. SOFTSWISS does not publish their pricing publicly. Your inference framework from industry sources was useful for operator budgeting conversations.β
These responses from 2022 shaped the three years of editorial work that followed. Expand to 10 platforms. Add country-specific guides. Deepen licensing analysis. Keep the methodology transparent. Document regulatory issues honestly.
What set us apart at launch
From day one, we established four rules that still define the site in 2026.
Transparent on methodology. On every review page we explain how the score is calculated. No black box, no editorial secret.
Transparent on affiliate links. When you click through to a provider, a commission may be earned. That is stated on every page. Our rankings do not change because of it.
No invented test results. All numbers come from verifiable sources: provider own websites, regulatory registers, company press releases, and industry press.
Honest reporting on regulatory issues. Even in 2022, we covered regulatory history that other comparison sites ignored. The 2021 Dutch KSA fine against N1 Interactive (SOFTSWISS-powered) was documented on our SOFTSWISS review from launch. Operators deserved the full picture.
Who the website was built for
The audience in 2022 was narrower than later years. First-time operators launching their first casino brand without a strong network of industry references. Established operators evaluating migration from an incumbent platform. A small number of affiliate managers and consultants doing early research for client recommendations.
By 2026, this audience has broadened significantly: investors doing due diligence on iGaming technology stacks, consultants advising operator clients through regulatory change, and a much larger pool of affiliates in emerging LATAM and African markets. But the core audience the site was built for in 2022 remains the same: people who need to make a platform decision and do not want to be sold to.
What made a good white label casino platform in 2022
Before you compare, you need to know what you are looking for. In 2022, the criteria list reflected a different industry landscape than 2026.
The most important question was cost. The pandemic recovery was uneven and operators were price-sensitive. Setup fees for the platforms we covered ranged from roughly $10,000 to $40,000. Monthly fees ran $1,500 to $10,000. GGR share sat at 10% to 15% depending on provider. Operators needed to understand not just list prices but real total cost including payment processing and marketing.
Next came game library depth. Evolution was consolidating its live casino dominance. Pragmatic Play was accelerating slot production. NetEnt had been acquired by Evolution in 2020 and the market was still adjusting. Platforms with deep integration across major studios had a clear advantage.
Then there was time to launch. Operators wanted to move fast after the pandemic disruption. NuxGame (founded 2018) was offering rapid deployment. SOFTSWISS was the established benchmark at 6 to 10 weeks. Slotegrator was scaling its APIgrator product aggressively.
And finally: Bitcoin capability. Crypto adoption among casino players was growing after the 2020 to 2021 price cycle. SOFTSWISS had the deepest Bitcoin infrastructure. Other platforms were adding crypto integrations but often at a surface level. Operators targeting crypto-native players needed to know the difference.
The 7 platforms compared at launch in 2022
| Rank | Platform | Type | Setup Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SOFTSWISS | White Label | $18,000+ |
| 2 | SoftGamings | White Label | $18,000 to $40,000 |
| 3 | EveryMatrix | Enterprise Modular | $35,000+ |
| 4 | BetConstruct | Enterprise Modular | $30,000 to $80,000 |
| 5 | NuxGame | Turnkey and API | $10,000 to $25,000 |
| 6 | Slotegrator | Turnkey / White Label | $14,000 to $30,000 |
| 7 | GammaStack | Turnkey / Custom | $12,000 to $30,000 |
The initial 7-platform list was intentionally selective. We only included platforms where we had sufficient data to score meaningfully against public sources. Gamingtec, White Hat Gaming and Oddsgate were added in subsequent years as we expanded coverage.
For operators who wanted to orient themselves quickly, the homepage included a direct comparison. For those who wanted to dig deeper, every platform had its own review page.
The development of the website
best-white-label-casinos.org launched in early 2022. The initial project was small: 7 platforms reviewed, a homepage comparison, and a handful of B2B guide articles covering licensing basics and cost structures.
The content philosophy was set at launch and has not changed. Produce reviews that reflect genuine research effort. Document methodology transparently. Flag regulatory issues honestly. Do not accept payment for ranking changes. Keep content current.
2022 was the year we established these principles. 2023 and 2024 were years of expanding coverage and deepening analysis. 2025 and 2026 were years of refinement and audience growth. The 418 respondents in the 2022 founding survey became 441 in 2023, 463 in 2024, 487 in 2025 and 512 in 2026. The site grew at the pace of genuinely useful content, not the pace of paid marketing.
What came next
After launch in 2022, the priority list was clear: expand to 10 platforms (achieved by 2024), add country-specific guides for emerging markets (Philippines, Kenya, Nigeria, Malta added through 2023 and 2024), deepen licensing analysis (completed through the platform type and fee structure subcategory pages), and add parallel crypto casino coverage for the B2C audience.
For anyone who wanted to get started in 2022: the initial 7-platform comparison was on the homepage. Anyone interested in our early top pick could find the detailed SOFTSWISS review.
Frequently asked questions about the 2022 launch
Who conducted the 2022 survey?
The phone survey was conducted in April 2022 by the Editorial Team of best-white-label-casinos.org. 418 iGaming industry professionals were surveyed, including active casino operators, platform software developers and iGaming affiliates.
Why launch a white label casino comparison site in 2022?
The iGaming niche lacked a neutral reference for white label platform research. Trade press had commercial relationships with the platforms they covered. Provider websites were marketing pages. Operators relied on trade show conversations and LinkedIn references, neither of which provided traceable scoring. The founding hypothesis was that operators wanted an independent reference. The 2022 survey confirmed it.
How many platforms were covered at launch?
7 platforms at launch in 2022. The list expanded to 8 in 2023, 9 in early 2024, and 10 by late 2024. The current 10-platform list is SOFTSWISS, SoftGamings, NuxGame, EveryMatrix, GammaStack, BetConstruct, Slotegrator, Gamingtec, White Hat Gaming, and Oddsgate.
Which platform led the 2022 ranking?
SOFTSWISS was our top-scoring platform from launch. The rationale has been consistent across all five survey years: strong Bitcoin casino infrastructure, MGA B2B sublicensing, ISO 27001 certification, and the largest documented launched-brand base in the industry.
Can early reviews still be trusted?
The 2022 reviews reflected the industry as it existed that year. We update reviews regularly, and the 2026 versions of SOFTSWISS, SoftGamings, NuxGame and EveryMatrix reviews contain substantially more data and documentation than the 2022 versions. The core scoring principles have remained consistent across all four years.
Has the scoring methodology changed since 2022?
Yes, but in refinements not in principles. Weightings have shifted to reflect what operators were prioritising each year (licensing support weighted higher in 2024 during regulatory transitions, pricing weighted higher in 2023 during post-pandemic cost pressure). The core principle (score against verifiable public data, no paid ranking changes, red flags reported honestly) has not changed since launch.
Where can operators read the current reviews?
The 2026 comparison of 10 platforms is on the homepage. The detailed SOFTSWISS review has been kept current since 2022 and reflects the most up-to-date pricing, licensing and operational data.
Looking for the best white label casino platform?
Compare 10 providers by cost, launch time, licensing support and game library. Independent editorial β no paid placements.
Compare All Platforms βSome links in this article may be affiliate links. iGaming Index may earn a commission at no cost to you. This does not affect editorial independence. Read our terms.